Faculty Showcase Videos
Thirty-five STEM faculty from UC Irvine, San Jose State University, and Cal Poly Pomona demonstrated how mastery learning & specifications grading boosts students’ growth mindset and enhances their learning experience in the Teaching Experiment Academy (TEA) Summit on April 28 & 29, 2022.
UC Irvine
Veronica Berrocal – Statistics
Revising An Upper-Level Undergraduate Statistics Course Using Specifications Grading
Natascha Buswell – Engineering
Using Specifications Grading to Shift the Focus from Learning the Content to Learning in Context
David Copp – Engineering
Using Specifications Grading To Better Align Assessments With Learning Objectives In Engineering Design Project Courses
Christopher Davis – Mathematics
Canvas Tips for Specifications Grading
Michelle Digman – Engineering
Implementing Specification Grading and Mastery Learning for Photomedicine
Franklin Dollar – Physics & Astronomy
Specifications Grading In A Large Lecture, Introductory Physics Class
Aimee Edinger – Biology
Working Towards Mastery Grading In An Intro Biology Course
Celia Faiola – Biology
Teaching Ecology and Evolution with Specifications Grading
Alfredo Freites – Chemistry
Implementing Specifications Grading in a Mathematics and Scientific Computing for Chemistry Course
Irene Gassko – Computer Sciences
On A Way To Specification Grading
Patrick Hong – Engineering
Aligning Course Design To Help Students Develop A Growth Mindset, Grit, And Agency Using Specification Grading Leveraging The Canvas Learning Management System
David Kirkby – Physics & Astronomy
First Steps in Specs Grading for Upper Division Physics
Rachel Martin & Jessica Kelz – Chemistry
Implementation of Specifications Grading in Upper-Division Chemical Biology Course
Michael Ratz – Physics & Astronomy
Specification Grading Light
Jon-Erik Tateri – Engineering
Creating a Happy Medium Between Traditional and Specifications Grading
Laura Tucker – Physics & Astronomy
Using Specifications Grading With Mastery Quizzes And Other Alternatives
San José State University
Brian Andrade – Engineering
Upper-Division Aerodynamics Labs and Specifications Grading
Jodie Clark – Meteorology
Implementing Mastery Learning Outcomes and Specifications Grading in an Online Asynchronous GE Science Course
Burford Furman – Engineering
Specs/Mastery Synthesis for ME-EE 106 Fundamentals of Mechatronics
Gerasimos Kontos – Engineering
Specifications Grading Implementation for Special Topics in Aerospace Engineering (AE297)
Kaikai Liu – Engineering
Specification Grading For Data Mining Programming Tasks
Tony Pan – Engineering
My Experience in Learning and Implementing Specification Grading
Yazdan P. Razi – Engineering
Some Comments On Specifications Grading: Application Of The Method In A Mathematical Context
Carlos Rojas – Engineering
Applying Mastery Grading to a Software Engineering
Navrati Saxena – Computer Science
Implementing Specifications Grading System: My Journey So Far
Mojtaba Sharifi – Engineering
Specs/Mastery Synthesis for ME-EE 106 Fundamentals of Mechatronics
Shreeyukta Singh – Chemistry
Specific Grading in Chemistry Lab
Mahima Agumbe Suresh – Engineering
Specifications Grading Implementation for the Undergraduate Computer Networks Course
Igor Tyukhov – Engineering
Introduction Rubrics To “Energytainment” Thermal Engineering Lab And Energy Engineering Courses
David Wagner – Engineering
Specifications Grading in a Chemical Engineering Capstone Course
Mike Wu – Computer Science
Applying Specifications Grading to a Database Design and Project class and How It Matches to Course Learning Outcomes
Cal Poly Pomona
Berit Givens – Mathematics
Building a Reasonable List of Outcomes to Assess: A Case Study
Karina Novoa – Mathematics
An Overview (With Examples) Of Implementing Sbg In An Introductory Statistics Course
Greg Placencia – Engineering
Developing and Implementing a Specifications Grading System for Human Factors Engineering and Engineering Economics Courses